A TeleportHQ alternative when the code is the only thing included

This is the reason TeleportHQ exists and there is no arguing with it. A static project can leave as React, Vue, Angular, Next.js, Nuxt or plain HTML and CSS, with a choice of CSS strategy, pushed to GitHub or downloaded as a ZIP. The generator that does it is open source under MIT and was last updated in September 2026, and the intermediate format it works from is publicly documented. Grigora has no code export at all. Content exports, the site does not.

Takeaway: If owning the front-end source is a requirement rather than a preference, the comparison ends here and TeleportHQ wins it.

TeleportHQ treats Figma as a first-class entry point, not a novelty. The official plugin imports whole prototypes into the editor, or copies selected layers out as usable HTML and CSS, and those layers carry on into React, Vue, Next or Angular. Grigora has no Figma import. It starts from a text description or a website template instead.

Takeaway: For a team whose designs already live in Figma, TeleportHQ removes a handoff step that Grigora does not attempt.

TeleportHQ prices dynamic capabilities through interactive project slots: Pro lists none and Premium includes one, with additional slots billed separately. Grigora includes CMS, newsletter and store features on paid plans, with its own site and usage allowances. Grigora does not replace arbitrary application logic, authentication or backend integrations.

Takeaway: On Pro you are paying $14 a month for a builder that cannot sell anything until you add $19.99 to it.

Where it is switched on, this is a real store rather than a buy button: products and catalogue, inventory with backorders, orders, customers, Stripe checkout, branded invoices, shipping logic and an admin panel for staff. It is also very new. TeleportHQ's help centre has no e-commerce category at all yet, so everything knowable about it comes from marketing pages. Grigora's store ships on Starter with 0% platform commission.

Takeaway: TeleportHQ's store reads well on the pricing page and has no documentation behind it; Grigora's store is included on paid plans.

TeleportHQ has no email marketing. Not a light version, none: there is no list, segment, campaign, broadcast or automation anywhere in the live pricing matrix, and the help centre has no category for it. The only email it sends is transactional, triggered by a store, which means Premium or a paid slot. Lead capture stops at forms, capped at 10 forms and 2,000 submissions a month on Pro, with the submissions sitting in the dashboard waiting for you to export them somewhere else.

Takeaway: TeleportHQ can collect the email address. Mailing it is somebody else's subscription.

TeleportHQ's dynamic blog is well specified on paper: a listing page, a generated page per post, a dedicated editor for titles, thumbnails and slugs, post and category management, author management, per-post SEO and an AI writing assistant. The footnote is that the Pro column ticks it while carrying the same interactive-slot tooltip used on the web app and store rows, so whether a blog is fully usable on Pro is not clear from their own page. Grigora's CMS has no asterisk on any plan.

Takeaway: Grigora wins on certainty here more than on features: you can tell what the entry plan includes by reading one line.

TeleportHQ's published ceilings are low for anything commercial, and lower than the plan they replaced: 10 GB of bandwidth a month on Pro and 50 GB on Premium, against 200 GB on the retired Professional plan. Asset storage is 1 GB per project on Pro with a 10 MB file cap. AI is token-budgeted and explicitly does not roll over. Then the add-ons stack: seats, slots, locales and domains are all priced separately. One of them, localisation, is something Grigora genuinely cannot match at any price.

Takeaway: Compare included bandwidth, storage, AI tokens and add-ons on both platforms. Grigora also has page, bandwidth and storage limits.

Both host what you build, with SSL and a CDN, and TeleportHQ adds Vercel deployment and a staging environment that Grigora does not offer. The difference is what it takes to get a finished, unbranded site in front of people. On TeleportHQ that requires a subscription: the trial cannot remove the badge, cannot download code and cannot make a project private. Grigora offers a free trial, and paid plans that cover one to five sites with their own domains.

Takeaway: A seven day window with a badge you cannot remove is a demo, not a free plan.

This one is genuinely close, and TeleportHQ is stronger here than most visual builders bother to be. Its SEO toolset is on every paid plan rather than gated: meta and social metadata, sitemaps, redirects, canonicals, robots.txt and llms.txt management, automatic WebP conversion, plus an explicit answer-engine optimisation feature. Grigora answers with schema controls, IndexNow submission and free SEO tools on the marketing site.

Takeaway: Compare the published SEO controls with your actual content and workflow. Test representative pages for crawlability, metadata and performance; platform features do not guarantee rankings or AI citations.